Patient Facts Study Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison


dc.contributor.authorWieand, Kaleigh
dc.contributor.otherPEDSnet Data Coordinating Center
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-16T21:51:44Z
dc.date.created2025-09
dc.description- National has anomalously low proportion of patients with procedures across all visit types, especially ED visits. This is a known issue with their CDM submission, so this is not unexpected. - Nemours has anomalously low proportion of patients with all facts in ED and inpatient visits for this cohort. Nemours has some known issue with fact relationships and inpatient visits, so this could be the result of visit misclassification. - Lurie has anomalously low proportion of patients with most facts for inpatient visits. - Nationwide has an anomalously /high/ proportion of patients with MCV and hemoglobin labs in ED visits, despite having a low density of these facts per patient year in this domain. This tells us that these two labs are well populated but maybe not administered as frequently as other institutions.
dc.description.abstractThe results of a Patient Facts check using the Mulit-Site, Anomaly Detection, Cross-Sectional parameters. This check investigates anomalous proportions of patients with facts in relevant domains based on the visit type of interest.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14642/1253
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24373/pdsp-595
dc.publisherPEDSnet
dc.rightsa CC-BY Attribution 4.0 license.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectPerson-Level Analysis
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Analysis
dc.subjectMulti-Site Analysis
dc.subjectData Anomaly Method
dc.subject.meshAnemia, Sickle Cell
dc.subject.meshHematologic Tests
dc.titlePatient Facts Study Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison
dc.typestudy
dspace.entity.typeDQResult
local.admin.notev57
local.description.outcomesThis output highlights visit type specific heterogeneity in patient fact representation. This could potentially be due to visit misclassification in the CDM, so we plan to do more investigation to determine the root cause of this issue. We will place special emphasis on investigating the two institutions that had wide-spread low fact population for this cohort.
local.dqcheck.outcomesAdditional DQ Investigation
local.dqcheck.resultobsDisparate Site Behavior
local.dqcheck.resultobsAnomalies Observed
local.subject.DataProvPEDSnet Data Source
relation.isDQCheckOfDQResult79a702f1-0925-4a57-9f7d-d1b15b793261
relation.isDQCheckOfDQResult.latestForDiscovery79a702f1-0925-4a57-9f7d-d1b15b793261
relation.isDQResultOfDQResultc1c970f7-f2f3-45f8-846d-f35091536e2b
relation.isDQResultOfDQResult.latestForDiscoverya54c6e9e-4aa8-462d-9bcb-760a25e0a6a5
relation.isDocumentationOfDQResultc5d447aa-7544-441f-b454-016b43b3bdcd
relation.isDocumentationOfDQResult.latestForDiscoveryc5d447aa-7544-441f-b454-016b43b3bdcd
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResultda598fc2-bed7-4a0d-92d7-fc2517b715de
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResultcc4d0004-ec82-4d55-8a8d-61a3b0e7a09a
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResult4a9c59a3-af72-449e-b5c0-2db953ff475a
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResultc8e42b1c-6ffb-4b73-b893-ae4b5fe07dfa
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResultcdb3cef9-ebdd-4ca8-9000-14573ba301bf
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResult32f633d4-ee75-467f-a1a2-24c207244346
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResultff3cd76b-cf4c-44c1-84a6-368cfd0e9123
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResulta118440c-013c-4d44-b7ce-19a9b1441304
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResultf17f740b-c35e-4a0e-9d83-7e051d0c64c5
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResult751635c0-bac7-47e0-95ea-c78f3cb31390
relation.isOrgUnitOfDQResult.latestForDiscovery6e9d0eea-a059-4bda-88ac-7c2d7b8d8102
relation.isStudyOfDQResulta06c92dd-336b-4b1b-b7d9-fb4701104fb1
relation.isStudyOfDQResult.latestForDiscoverya06c92dd-336b-4b1b-b7d9-fb4701104fb1

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pf_ms_anom_cs_dqr4.csv
Size:
65.94 KB
Format:
Comma-Separated Values

Domains