Patient Facts Study Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison
Created
Loading...
Files
1 Download↓
Last Modified
Findings
Tags
Domain
Publisher
PEDSnet
Abstract
The results of a Patient Facts check using the Mulit-Site, Anomaly Detection, Cross-Sectional parameters. This check investigates anomalous proportions of patients with facts in relevant domains based on the visit type of interest.
Affiliation(s)
Funder(s)
Provenance
Description
- National has anomalously low proportion of patients with procedures across all visit types, especially ED visits. This is a known issue with their CDM submission, so this is not unexpected.
- Nemours has anomalously low proportion of patients with all facts in ED and inpatient visits for this cohort. Nemours has some known issue with fact relationships and inpatient visits, so this could be the result of visit misclassification.
- Lurie has anomalously low proportion of patients with most facts for inpatient visits.
- Nationwide has an anomalously /high/ proportion of patients with MCV and hemoglobin labs in ED visits, despite having a low density of these facts per patient year in this domain. This tells us that these two labs are well populated but maybe not administered as frequently as other institutions.
Response to Findings
This output highlights visit type specific heterogeneity in patient fact representation. This could potentially be due to visit misclassification in the CDM, so we plan to do more investigation to determine the root cause of this issue. We will place special emphasis on investigating the two institutions that had wide-spread low fact population for this cohort.
Clinical Subjects Headings
Development Code
Vocabulary
Related Publications
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as a CC-BY Attribution 4.0 license.
Cite this Data Quality Result
Wieand, K. (2025, August). Patient Facts Study Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison. [D Q Result]. PEDSpace Knowledge Bank. https://doi.org/10.24373/pdsp-595

