Patient Facts Study Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison
Created
Loading...
Files
1 Download↓
Last Modified
Findings
Tags
Domain
Publisher
PEDSnet
Abstract
The results of a Patient Facts check using the Multi-Site, Exploratory, Cross-Sectional parameters. This check investigates fact density at inpatient, ED, hematologist, and all visits. There was a special emphasis on labs to identify density of important study variables.
Affiliation(s)
Funder(s)
Provenance
Description
- Nationwide and on some occasions Nemours appear to have low lab fact density across each of the study-relevant labs (hemoglobin, ANC, MCV) and all visit types.
- Colorado and Seattle generally have the highest density of these lab tests.
- There is heterogenous behavior across sites, especially in the “all labs” domain. For specific labs of interest, there is still a spread but over a much smaller range of values.
Response to Findings
This output illustrates that there are site-specific issues with fact density related to important lab variables for this project. Encouragingly, based on the small differences between the medians both with and without patients who do not have evidence of the fact types, it seems that enough patients in the cohort have at least one recorded test of these types so as to not drag down the median. We will do more analysis to investigate the issues with labs and determine how it can be best addressed.
Clinical Subjects Headings
Development Code
Vocabulary
Related Publications
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as a CC-BY Attribution 4.0 license.
Cite this Data Quality Result
Wieand, K. (2025, August). Patient Facts Study Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison. [D Q Result]. PEDSpace Knowledge Bank. https://doi.org/10.24373/pdsp-591

