Created
Last Modified
Findings
Tags
Domain
Publisher
PEDSnet
Abstract
The results of a Clinical Events & Specialty Agreement check using the Multi-Site, Exploratory, Cross-Sectional parameters. This check investigates specialty utilization, both at the provider & care site levels, for patients with a sickle-cell diagnosis. This check was run to evaluate the impact of a targeted remapping of specialties to recover additional information from the source value fields.
Affiliation(s)
Funder(s)
Provenance
Description
- After remapping the hematology specialties that could be re-identified via the source value fields, both Seattle (in the provider domain) and National (in the care site domain) displayed increases in the amount of visits associated with a hematologist.
- National, as a result of this remapping, was able to recover all of the patients originally lost in the attrition.
- Other than this, the findings from the previous round of specialty analysis stand.
Response to Findings
This analysis confirms that remapping these specialties improves patient retention and reflects a more expected pattern of specialty utilization. We formally applied this remapping, by creating an artificial concept identifier to represent hematology specialists that were re-identified, to our CDM and will continue to use this mapping throughout the rest of the analysis.
Clinical Subjects Headings
Development Code
Vocabulary
Related Publications
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as a CC-BY Attribution 4.0 license.
Cite this Data Quality Result
Wieand, K. (2025, August). Clinical Event & Specialty Agreement Results Part II: SSDQA Comparison. [D Q Result]. PEDSpace Knowledge Bank. https://doi.org/10.24373/pdsp-590

